Cellular Ribosomes: The Origin of Life?

A recent paper in the Journal of Theoretical Biology[i] boasts a solution to the “Many steps in the evolution in cellular life.”  The authors suggest that the ribosome, a cellular machine of tremendous complexity and specificity, may be an important link between cellular metabolism for life and the first living cell (or “last universal common ancestor”).  This new theory suggests that the RNA strands which comprises the scaffold for the 80 or so proteins that bind to it to create the functional ribosome has genetic information for the sequences that we now find in the DNA molecule for both the transfer RNAs (20 are made in modern cells, one for each amino acid, which facilitate protein assembly) as wells as some of the genetic information for coding for those 80 proteins that make up the ribosome itself.  The idea is to find a system that is truly self-replicating, that would not be dependent on cellular life so to act as a precursor for cellular life.  Rather than the selfish gene notion of Dawkins this would be a selfish ribosome notion.  The ribosome would be acting as the catalyst for a cellular entity in which to selfishly house itself and replicate itself more effectively.

My Description

Two massive polymolecular units which combine to make the ribosome are needed for translation. The small unit is on the left and the large unit is on the right. Combined they represent 4 large RNA molecules with 70 proteins attached to the frame. The unit is a masterpiece of precision engineering… not a random association of stuff.




The over all function of the ribosome is to translate the RNA sequence into a protein sequence.

The over all function of the ribosome is to translate the RNA sequence into a protein sequence.

The idea that is being proposed is that if it could be shown that the ribosomal RNA carries the genetic information, like DNA does today, for the production of all the components (or many of them) required to produce the 20 transfer RNAs, the many ribosomal proteins and even other supporting proteins (synthetases, polymerases, phosphatases, methylases) needed to make a functional ribosome AND still allow the a three dimensional assembly of that same ribosome RNA then what we have is a self-replicating system that acts both as the genetic databank for making itself as well as the ability to self-assemble to translate its genetic data into proteins for the replication of itself – without the need for a living cell!





Using bioinformatic approaches the researchers aligned the known sequences of the transfer RNAs, ribosomal protein genes and some of the supporting enzyme proteins with the sequences for the E. coli ribosomal RNA (rRNA).  A few of the alignments of the sequences were published in the paper.  A good sequence alignment would be a match would have 80% identity between sequences of at around 18 residues in tandem.  For instance:



gggc……  t.. ttttaccgagtcatcatcccatttgtt……ccactgatttaaccggatcgatcag


The researchers changed the default settings of their program to increase the likelihood that alignments would be found.   Acceptance criteria for hits were considered at 55% match or higher over the length of sequences but none of these results showed contiguous alignments.  A 50:50 probability is not much better than flipping a coin.  These are very weak criteria. To further support their claim, sequences showing promising alignments were then subject to searches for internal hybridization of the molecule’s residues.  This kind of internal association of the single strands of RNA create lengths of double stranded RNA, hairpin loops and overall a three dimensional configuration held by the hydrogen bonding between base pairs comprising the strand.   Such a configuration would look like this:


Single stranded RNA becomes double stranded through internal basepair bonding.  These create bubbles, loops, hairpin turns given the single strand three dimensional configuations.

Single stranded RNA becomes double stranded through internal base pair bonding. These create bubbles, loops, hairpin turns giving the single strand three dimensional configurations.



By performing this computation on the sequences they suspect of supporting their premise, similar structures were formed between internal base pairs even though the actual homology of those residues did not exist.  This is not surprising.  Almost any RNA sequence will give rise to some semblance of order when using software algorithms to perform the function.   For instance, here is the upstream sequence of a gene I sequenced 20 years ago and put through the RNA secondary structure prediction:


The promoter region of the pea ribosomal protein gene L9 as a transcript.

The promoter region of the pea ribosomal protein gene L9 as a transcript.

I can also cut out those sequences that I don’t like and repeat the program.

I can also create the RNA transcript for the coding region of the gene and perform the same analysis:


RNA transcript predicted secondary structure of the coding region of pea rpL9

RNA transcript predicted secondary structure of the coding region of pea rpL9


This might look meaningful but it is not.


Even if the observation by these researchers had some credibility, the facts could have many different meanings than evidence of some evolutionary ancestry.  One possibility is that the secondary structures formed in all RNA  manufactured ensures stability or promote recognition by proteins that either sequester or enhance translation.  Also, such secondary structures might be signals in the genes for all of these proteins and the rRNA; signals that regulate the assembly of the components of the ribosome as they are needed in order to perform quality checks or control over production of unwanted parts.   It would make sense that any gene associated with the assembly of the ribosome has signals of some sort to coordinately regulate the production of each component as assembly proceeds.  In 2000 I published a paper on the promoter region of plant ribosomal RNA genes and found a sequence in the promoter region that was found in all the genes for the ribosomal proteins as well as in RNA polymerases.  This region was found in both orientations and on both the positive and negative strands of the genes.  A second paper by another author suggested that the site is specific to those genes required for protein translation and must be involved in coordinately regulating some 200 components needed for the ribosome and their associated proteins to be produced.  This makes sense for the thousands of ribosomal particles to be efficiently assembled saving the cell energetics and controlling cellular “costs”.  To date, no one has described how the cell regulates each component of ribosomal biosynthesis for eukaryotic cells, though for the bacteria the process is well understood.

All in all, the authors may have found something.  But there is no reason to think it has anything to do with evolution.  This is what the theory does to modern biology.  It gets in the way of real research and meaningful progress in understanding how the cell was engineered.  The entire proposition ignores how such complexity is formed by natural means and does not speak of the molecular environment that would be needed for a ribosome to function outside of a cell.   It is in simple terms “bogus.”


 not genuine or true; fake.
  1. “a bogus insurance claim”


[i] J Theor Biol. 2014 Dec 10;367C:130-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.11.025. [Epub

ahead of print]  The ribosome as a missing link in the evolution of life.  Root-Bernstein M(1), Root-Bernstein R(2).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *